In 1942, Albert Einstein just gave an exam to his senior class of physics students. His assistant asked him, “isn’t that exactly the same exam you gave to exactly the same class one year ago?”
“Yeah, yeah,” said Einstein, “it’s exactly the same.”
“But Dr Einstein, how could you possibly do that?”, the assistant said.
“Well,” said Einstein, “the answers have changed.”
What each of us knows today will be replaced with a more accurate truth in the future. These incremental steps toward a firmer reality are often called “science changing its mind”. It is true, but it is also called improvement towards a more correct answer.
Now in business, according to the data, approximately 3% of people are inclined to even do different things outside the box when what they’ve been doing fails them. The remaining 97% continues to smash into the wall, trying to get different results by doing more or less of the same thing. Using the same answers in a recycled failure.
—Enter religion
Rewording, revisiting, attempting to replace the failed with an even older version of what has failed complete civilizations is the Christian way. Ontology was a guess, and it’s reworks and investigations are guesses as to what the guesses meant. And now as it turns out, in the years immediately after the CE began, there was no beginning truth. Only a con man named Paul who introduced his own gospel based on a character that is fictional. Which, btw, is a masterful stroke on basic human psychology. Less fact equals more faith, and zero fact equals great faith—the pride associated with mere belief is a cognitive dissonance dream come true. Belief is an untouchable sacredity for the common people when belief is all the knowledge they can muster, and will then defend a falsehood to the death over pride.
Reminds me of the Seventh Day Adventists. Why would they let catastrophic error and misjudgment change their minds?
Heaven’s Gate: Let’s all take poison and die so that we can be with god.
Ummm, you said he was everywhere. Why die?
Jonestown?
I like the Islamist one: The children are innocent and without sin, they will be in heaven with Allah. Therefore, it is ok if we kill them.
And they call us bullies because we rebel against this bull shit. Lawdy, lawdy!
LikeLiked by 5 people
But non belief is a highly stigmatized position. In most regions it is better to admit to a belief in JWs or Islam than admit to not believing. Our evolutionary wiring is due for a reboot. Realities have changed faster than we as a whole can keep up with.
LikeLiked by 6 people
Right, Jim. There are no gods and never were. Religion has filled gaps long enough. Time to replace superstition with science.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh, Jim,
Thank you for putting me in the 3%, it means so much to me. But, is that the top 3%, the bottom 3%, or a middle 3%. Oh please tell me it is the top 3%. Oh, I so much want to be part of the top 3%. Tell me true, oh Jim…
And Jim did say unto his followers, please do not make me say which 3% it is. Just be happy it is the 3%. Being of the 97% is to be part of the sheep. The sheep look up, and they see what is not there. You look up, and you do not see what is not there. That means no one yet sees the mystery that is there. Be glad you are not of the 0%. You would see that everything is nothing, and nothing everything. So spake Jim, and all were confused.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Rawgod 19:11
LikeLike
rawgod 1:1 And the universe was there all the time, just waiting for life to discover it.
rawgod 1:2 And when life discovered the universe, the fifth and sixth planets rammed into each other. The big bang was heard across that universe, and it woke life up from its eternal sleep.
rawgod 1:3 And humanity has been lieing ever since…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jimoeba 1:3 It may sound strange to say that the universe has always existed but it has a finite age, but this is the way it is. The universe has always existed—there is no time at which it didn’t. There is just a finite amount of time, hence why the universe can be said to have an age. The universe is timeless…time, is not
LikeLiked by 1 person
@rawgod
Good sermon for Sunday! 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
This reminds me of January of 2018 when I just started Maddyz Physics. I was reading A Brief History of Time and I just got informed through the web of this incident of 1942 about Einstein.
We have improved our understanding of the universe and our thoughts about the universe has revolutionized in past 150 years..
LikeLiked by 5 people
You’re always welcome to throw in a link to your article there buddy.
LikeLike
Paul could just be a made up character. But this is subject of future debate
LikeLiked by 3 people
I think Professor Taboo did a 4 part series on just this! 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
I should check that out
LikeLiked by 2 people
Most likely the entire thing is made up by someone very keen on the foibles of human psychology. Who would that have been is my question?
LikeLike
Paul appears to have been Christianity’s first Benny Hinn.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sheazebeueahhhzemutaltivit!!! In tongues that means “I can’t believe people fall for this shit. Lololol! Oh the power of the crowd and insiders.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Whoever he was, he created the template that others have used successfully
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes very debatable but there is some argument as to whether he wrote all of the letters ascribed to him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is scholarship that says some of the letters were forgeries
LikeLiked by 1 person
It IS cognitive dissonance 😂😂😂 I never understood the concept beyond believing in something just because it feels good with zero actual evidence…
LikeLiked by 3 people
Wait! Does that mean I won’t be able to tempt you into taking advantage of my special discount offer on genuine magnetic therapy rings and bracelets? Bummer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I prefer non essential oils and any form of multilevel marketing. If your going all out cult, at least you could provide a product that collects dust on the back of the toilet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s called the feel good factor and most of us humans do it all the time. It’s why drugs are so popular they take us out of this world.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I really liked this post. Especially the opening story about Albert Einstein. Very cool
LikeLiked by 3 people
You’re very right, Jim. It is indeed interesting to see the difference in the reactions of the two groups, science and religion, when new information is discovered.
The world of science can be stubborn and initially resist the discovery of new information, but when it comes down to it science is based on facts that can be discovered, tested, reproduced, etc. and eventually the facts win.
With religion, well, we all know what happens there when new facts are discovered: Condemnation of the discoverer, cries of heresy, verbal abuse, physical assaults, calls for death, complete denial of fact, claims of conspiracy theories… (Hmm, denial of facts, verbal abuse, claims of conspiracy theories… sounds a lot like the bunch of weasels over in D.C. and most state capitals these days, but that’s another story)
I think the 97% might be exaggerated, but there are a large number of people who will resist accepting any new facts, even if it is beneficial to them personally. Just ask my wife about her experiences in management.
LikeLiked by 7 people
The 3% is referring to innovators in business. Sorry if that wasn’t clear. Statistically about 8-12% of Americans could be considered true skeptics, while others still dabble in agnosticism or other paranormal possibilities—ghosts, UFOs, etc.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Grouchyfarmer pretty much nailed what I was thinking, so I’m just gonna say “Great post Jim!”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks. Interestingly the biases can be beaten with a little awareness of the foibles of human psychology, and a realization that any firm belief is utter nonsense. Religion proudly promoting faith as an ultimate prize is stifling.
LikeLike
All of the things we know should be provisional, very few things are certain, and most subject to change as our understandings improve. Not being able to change our views in the face of more accurate information makes for a fine definition regarding the religious.
LikeLiked by 2 people
May nothing bless you, my child…
LikeLiked by 3 people
Lol. I get that a lot! All the worst to you as well
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it was Fourat (who used to blog) who said of science: it is the process of being less wrong.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Good one! I can’t improve on all the witty banter here, so I will refrain.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I appreciate your restraint.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great post Jim
LikeLiked by 2 people
One way you get into the 3% is be reversing the layout of how comments are posted – it will help stop my eyes spinning like slot machine reels.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Not sure why it does that. I’ll adjust it again. See what happens.
LikeLike
That’s better. Thanks for the tip!!
LikeLike
Thank you, Mr 3%
🙂
LikeLike
Igualmente!!
LikeLike
de nada.
LikeLike